Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse

CLOUDFARE Security Message

Over the past few days you may have received a "Checking if the site connection is secure" message when accessing the site. This is perfectly normal and not cause for alarm.

This message indicates that the server is confirming that the SSL (the "s" that you see in the https before web addresses) security is, in fact, secure. This is not some sort of advertisement and it is not some sort of nefarious hacking.

Cloudfare, which is a provide of web hosting and security, has recently added this layer of security on the Soap Central message boards platform as an added layer of security.

The message may occur any time that your browser makes a new connection to the boards. The message may also stop appearing at any time as the process is further integrated into the boards.
See more
See less

Luke's name was mentioned...

Collapse

Ad Below Title

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • believeinme246
    commented on 's reply
    I agree with all said. In the interview, TG said that it was Monty who told him to protect the character of Luke, but Monty made him the man he was, who committed something terrible, but fiercely loved his wife and children. So to me, in her mind, Monty told him to protect and fight for that character. It seemed, however, that TG instead chose to protect and fight for the Luke that he created, the one that as a far cry from the character who many of us fell in love with. I admire TG terribly for being absolutely sick that the rape was considered to be something seductive, but I also think that he terribly misread Monty's comments. JMHO.

  • militarymom
    replied
    Sorry, but I hope Loke never returns!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ribbonette
    replied
    Echoing what others said. No need for Luke to return EVER. The ending of his time was about as good as it could have been and bringing him back, even for a short stint, would ruin that.

    With that, I also agree that Luke shouldn't be recast. I didn't like him for the last decade or so, but he is an iconic character and highly unlikely another actor would be accepted as Luke. The only reason to bring him back would be for AG to make an appearance.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ribbonette
    commented on 's reply
    I agree. I never understood the transformation either, but it sounds like it was AG who decided the direction of Luke, not the writers/producers. He didn't want to be tied down to L&L. I much preferred the original - the adventurer who loved his family to the core.

  • jessie&phil
    commented on 's reply
    Thank you for your comment, I totally agree. I saw the NLG interview too and agree that Tony is very content. But I got the feeling from this interview and others I have read (post his leaving), that he would be open to a brief return if the story was right. I hope we get to see Tony on our GH screen again!

  • lukeslove
    commented on 's reply
    Robert might return with Holly if Emma Saams ever decides to cross the pond from England. Since she is recovering form Covid, I doubt she would be willing to come back to Los Angeles in these crazy times. As far as Tony Geary returning to the states ever is doubtful after hearing his interview with NLG.

  • desertfox
    replied
    I can see it now... Luke helps Robert to see if Holly is actually dead, only to find her alive and both arrive in PC together.

    Leave a comment:


  • ScrubsFan#1
    commented on 's reply
    You don't replace an icon like Luke Spencer with a recast. Tony is retired in Amsterdam and has no interest in coming back.

    The show doesn't need him anymore.

  • desertfox
    commented on 's reply
    Then most likely it will be a replacement for Anthony Geary if they have the character appear in PC.

  • soapgirl9
    commented on 's reply
    That's what I remember as well. He didn't seem like he had any interest in getting back on GH either.

  • CarnyQueen
    replied
    This might not be the place for this, but I just can't understand the evolution of Luke.

    I started watching after Luke raped Laura, but I got the impression (and Genie Francis confirmed it on "The Story of the Soaps") that Gloria Monty decided to try to paint it as a rape-seduction because she realized that she had hit pay dirt with the Luke & Laura pairing. Luke went from being a sort of conman with a sketchy past who was helping his sister Bobbie on a scheme (to get Scotty?) and then transformed into an adventurer who didn't do things by the book but who was definitely on the good guys' side. He saved the world from being frozen and all that.

    For a while he was the mayor of Port Charles, and then he left for a while and the actor came back as Bill Eckert and then Bill was offed and TG came back as Luke.... it's all very confusing in my memory.

    But I did get the impression that Luke, while a flawed man and not a conventional one, was supposed to be basically a good guy who loved Laura and Lucky and was a loving dad who spent a lot of time with his kid and loved Bobbie and Aunt Ruby and was a great friend to Robert and Sonny and a bunch of other people.

    I stopped watching for a long time and when I came back, Luke had turned into a sort of cynical, selfish grifter who had married Tracy for her money and was being mean to her. He had turned into a deadbeat dad who basically abandoned Lulu and just got worse from there, to the point where he supposedly struck and killed his grandson with a car and didn't really care.

    That whole transformation never made sense to me, but then I wasn't watching consistently enough to get a good idea of how it happened. Anyone want to fill me in?

    Leave a comment:


  • OLTLBoomer
    replied
    AG has closed the book on the character of Luke Spencer. His interview with NLG confirmed it.
    At the close of character on screen, Luke had reverted back to his original self. He could not be pinned down. Tracy alluded to his latest con with the "tulip bulbs" at Christmas, and the fact that Ned had to contact his mother tells us that Luke does not want to be found. Luke was always an independent, in the moment character; he was never like the other characters, keeping in touch with family and friends, unless he needed something or it was for someone he loved.
    I respect that TPTB have kept the character's image intact.

    Leave a comment:


  • Emerald Greens
    replied
    I had a feeling it was more about Robert and Olivia becoming confidants . With Brooklyn accusing her of having an affair and Ned walking in on see them hold hands I think it’s more about that even if it’s completely innocent. That said who knows how things will be rewritten with so much time to reconsider sl’s.

    Leave a comment:


  • CarnyQueen
    replied
    I think that if Luke agrees to help Robert they will be off on an adventure off-screen. But maybe the writers were setting it up so that Luke couldn't take part for some reason and Anna would go instead (giving FH her usual summer break, which now won't be needed).

    What struck me was that Luke has no become so bizarre that his onetime best friend doesn't have his number. Robert has to ask for Ned to get it from Tracy, and Ned says that Luke is particular about who gets his number. Has Luke become even jerkier in Amsterdam?

    For that matter, Robert didn't think about asking Lulu? Does Luke's daughter have a way of reaching him?

    Leave a comment:


  • lukeslove
    commented on 's reply
    In his interview with NLG he stated he had NO desire to return to the US. He loves his life in Amsterdam where he can live with no prying eyes watching his personal life. They may have Robert talking to Luke offscreen since they mentioned getting Luke's telephone number.

Google Matched Content

Collapse

Bottom of Page

Collapse
Working...
X
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎